In their recent podcast, Adam Johnson asks that journalists and “Think Tanks” dislose the interests of their funders, arguing
that if they did, most think tanks would go away because the enterprise serves as a giant information laundering operation:

This is a very liberal demand which is like can you at least disclose the people know and I think that’s really where you give the game away because if they did that they would be far far less funded and far less influential because they kind of nominal or widely perceived neutrality or or kind of academia sheen or branding is what gives them power

Krall’s father, Robert Krall, told Fox News Digital that his son “was very excited when he landed the fish and even more excited when he found out he is the new Wyoming state record holder for tiger trout.”

Why has Jimmy been so successful why did his videos catch on Jimmy’s popularity with younger viewers is probably based on the idea that he thinks like they do most of idea that he thinks like they do most of the videos on Jimmy’s Channel could be thought of as connected to the question what would a kid do with millions of dollars younger viewers live vicariously through Jimmy he represents their own immaturity and impulsivity here they see a young adult just a few years older than them handing out millions of dollars to people crushing cars driving trains into pits setting houses on fire building towers made of Lego bricks and playing all types of extreme games

In the Citizens United case, Justice Anthony Kennedy raised concerns that corporate knowledge would be lost if corporations were unable to engage in speech (political donations): Government silences a corporate objector, and those corporations may have the most knowledge of this on the subject. Corporations have lots of knowledge about environment, transportation issues, and you are silencing them during the election.

This argument is as artificial as classical economics’ concept of  Homo Economicus because it ignores how humans and society actually function.

In reality, when corporations “speak” to provide their “knowledge‘, it isn’t to distribute publications about the environment that their scientists discovered when they studied global warming. Rather, it means that they pay money to political front groups that pay political consultants to create 30-second ads on a completely different wedge issue, like gay marriage or CRT or DEI.

On August 21, 1790, George Washington wrote:

for, happily, the Government of the United States, which gives to bigotry no sanction, to persecution no assistance, requires only that they who live under its protection should demean themselves as good citizens in giving it on all occasions their effectual support.